best crash diets uk

hi, i’m john green, this is crash courseworld history, and today we’re going to talk about the holy roman empire. which as voltaire famously pointed out, wasnot holy, or roman, or an empire. but the holy roman empire can help us understandworld history, especially during the reign of its most powerful emperor, the smart, andsensible, and hard-working charles hapsburg,

best crash diets uk, known as carlos i in spain, and charles vin the rest of europe. so, lets frame it this way. in soccer, the worldcup is like a pretty big deal, especially for me. mr green? mr green? but i’m not even good at soccer you’re actually not that bad me from the past, but the

only two things you put into your body are wendy’sand cigarette smoke. and that… it’s not great for your athletic career.in 2014, the final pitted germany against argentina and if that game had been playedin 1550, both of those teams would’ve had the same head of state.the 2010 final between spain and the netherlands, again the same head of state - charles v.unfortunately, the 1550 world cup had to be postponed until after soccer was invented. so, charles v ruled one of the biggest empiresin history, behind only chinggis khan, joseph stalin and stalin’s successors in the sovietunion. in addition to claiming to rule most of europe,during charles’ lifetime, (1500-1558), one

of his dominions, spain, laid claim to nearlyall of the new world outside of brazil. and a few of his subjects -- the miserable survivorsof the fleet of ferdinand magellan -- became the first known humans to circumnavigate theglobe. under charles, the template for the colonizationof the americas and the christianization and treatment of its indigenous people was laiddown, and charles gave his seal of approval to the jesuit order to convert asia. he underwrotethe first mission settlements to california, and began the process of turning the islandsknown as the philippines into asia’s largest spanish-speaking country.but he wasn’t just a conqueror. charles also hosted the valladolid debates, the first-knowndiscussions of universal human rights -- and

he actively sought to end slavery for many.although, not for all, and he didn’t really succeed in ending it for anyone.yet, for all that, charles v isn’t known as a giant of world history. i mean his realm,the holy roman empire, was ultimately, a failed state, and his reign a bitter disappointment,even to himself. trying to rule an empire stocked with rebellioussubjects including martin luther and with territory in two hemispheres, charles v managedto totally bankrupt his realm and that was kind of impressive.because he had access to the silver and gold of the new world, the renaissance bankingfortunes of italy and the netherlands, and the military power of spain.in short, charles v was to the holy roman

empire what screech is to the saved by the bell alumni. by the time he died, crippled with gout andmalaria at the age of 58 - wait are we still talking about screech? no, apparently we’retalking about charles v now. anyway, the holy roman empire was defaultingon massive debts to its creditors. so among historians, the debate over whethercharles could have been a successful emperor tends to break into two schools of thought.one argues that the holy roman empire was doomed to fail largely because it lacked thenationalism that powered the rising nation-states like france and england.but voltaire was probably right, that the holy roman empire was doomed from birth. overit’s 1004-year-history, the holy roman empire

never had the means of levying direct taxes,or directly raising an army from its territory, which nearly always included what are todayeastern france, luxembourg, germany, austria, the italian peninsula, and czechoslovakia,and at times stretched to the netherlands, and belgium, hungary, croatia, poland, andwestern ukraine. governing such a vast area is almost impossible,especially when you have to have like you know people on horses to deliver messages.these days, even with the internet, governing europe isn’t that easy - ask the europeanparliamentg how it’s going. so the hre began in 800 ce as a marriage betweenthe germanic warlord, charlemagne, and the only sort of warlord-y popes in rome.after the collapse of the western roman empire

western christendom was basically a flockof rural warriors who reveled in trials by combat, christian conversion through combat,and, just generally combat. and charlemagne shrewdly recognized that thechurch’s mainly literate hierarchy and command of tradition were his best possible instrumentsfor governing his battle loving feudal lords. so charlemagne and pope leo iii struck a deal;leo would bestow upon charlemagne the authority and tradition of the caesars, while charlemagneacknowledged the church’s spiritual superiority over his secular power.and the name for the agreement reflected the terms of the deal. holy, because the churchwanted top billing, roman, to give charlemagne maximum prestige among his feudal subjects,and empire, because they wanted it to be an

empire.here’s a lesson in romance from history: marriages of convenience…. meh?so the relationship between the popes and the emperors grew a bit rocky over time. inthe centuries after charlemagne, one european warrior clan, the house of hapsburg foughtto claim the emperor’s throne, and to establish dominance over the papacy.and one of the tactics used by the hapsburgs was to promote dynastic marriages betweenhapsburg cousins, thus keeping inheritances within the family and out of the hands ofthe church. this hapsburg in-breeding worked politically,but, over centuries, it brought out recessive family genes for mental illness and -- mostfamously -- these oversized lower jaws that

became europe’s most-recognizable profile.in short, in-breeding - great way to keep money in the family, maybe not the best wayto keep a++ kings in the family. the papacy fought back and in 1356,the positionof holy roman emperor was turned into an elected position. candidates for the crown henceforthneeded to win support from at least four of seven “electors.”now this didn’t prevent the hapsburgs from reclaiming the throne, but it did force thefamily to pay fortunes in bribes and favors to win it, because as always, money wins elections.charles was no exception and the bribes he paid to secure the his position as emperorin 1521 meant that he started off his rule in debt - which is never a great idea.but wait, you say, now that he is emperor

he can just tap into a loyal group of subjects,who will be more than happy to pay tax increases in order to pay off charles’ debt.but yeah, that’s not how the holy roman empire worked. all right, let’s get to knowthis emperor in the thought bubble charles’s parents came from two ambitiousdynasties. his mother, juana, was the daughter of ferdinand and isabella, whom you’ve probablyheard of. and from juana, charles laid claim not only to spain but to parts of italy, includingnaples and sicily, as well as what became known as the americas. charles’s fatherwas the duke of burgundy, phillip the fair. and through philip, charles could claim the germanlands of the holy roman emperor, maximilian i, phillip’s father.so charles’s existence was pretty much a

genetic engineering job designed to producea ruler of spain and germany. only, charles was neither spanish nor german himself. hegrew up in belgium, in the dukedom of burgundy, which technically made him a french subject.and ruling over so many disparate people was a recipe for trouble. like, german peasantsin frisia had revolted against the empire in 1515, but they weren’t nearly as troublesomeas the germans living in towns. by the time charles bought his throne in 1521, germanmerchants had come to think of themselves as being guaranteed the rights to speak ina parliament, to have a say in their taxes and even to form their own militias.protestantism was also a big headache for charles, especially when luther and his followersclaimed that they followed their consciences

in matters of religion rather than the emperor’swill. charles thought that he solved this problem when he faced luther at the diet ofworms in 1523, but that didn’t work out quite as planned.thanks, thought bubble. so, at the diet of worms luther was so compelling when talkingabout his faith that he became more popular - not less.and shortly thereafter he began his famous german translation of the bible.so obviously, governing most of europe was just a tremendous difficulty for charles v,but he also had to be the ruler of all of the americas except for brazil.i can’t help but notice, stan, that brazil is always the exception in the americas.

and with the spanish conquistadors subjugation of the the american indians by the late 1530s,charles’s life got even worse or arguably better.because he was richer and had more subjects which is the point of being an emperor i guess.so unlike most of the spaniards in spain’s colonies, charles actually showed some concernfor his native subjects, but he couldn’t really do much.like in 1520, after receiving a steady stream of complaints about how the native peoplewere being abused, charles banned the granting of new encomiendas and ordered his officialsto phase out the old ones. and this worked … not at all. hernan cortesand other leading conquistadors completely

ignored charles orders and just kept dolingout encomiendas. and then charles sent new orders saying thatthe indians are “to live in liberty, as our vassals in castile live...if you havegiven any indians in encomienda to any christians you will remove them.”cortes responded, “the majority of the spaniards who come here are of low quality, violent,and vicious.” well, i guess he was self-aware. anyway, hisresponse amounted to - we could only get spanish people to come here if they have the rightto exploit other humans. and then in 1526, charles gave in and allowedcortes, and, later, pizarro, to issue temporary encomiendas to their men.now so far, charles isn’t looking so good

in this story, so it might be useful to comparehis record to those of his contemporaries, who, in theory, ruled more coherent and governablestates. and it just so happens that charles reignedat the same time as two of europe’s most notable proto-nationalistic leaders, england’shenry viii and france’s francis i of france. the bitterest rivalry was between francisand charles, because francis believed that charles, as the duke of burgundy, which isin france, was his subject. charles, meanwhile, knew that francis hadattempted to win the title of holy roman emperor himself, and had warned the electors thatcharles was an unfit and despotic man. if we could just stop for a moment. why onearth would anyone fight to become the holy

roman emperor.the two monarchs fought four separate wars against each other. and according to proponentsof nationalism, francis should have had the advantage, right. because he had unchallengedpower of taxation in france, and a religious class that was loyal to him, and a population,or at least an elite, that all spoke french. but charles’s troops won every war. notonly that, in the course of the wars charles’ troops managed to take francis himself hostageat the siege of pavia, and sack rome in 1527, ending the pope’s hope of becoming a realplayer in secular politics, and, according to some scholars, ending the italian renaissance.charles also fought a war against suleiman and the ottomans, defeating them at vienna,although he wasn’t able to stop suleiman

from consolidating his control over the formerlyhabsburg territory of hungary. but despite ruling this fractious, polyglotempire rather than a compact national state, charles did okay for himself.well at least by some measures - by other measure he was a total failure. oh, it’stime for the open letter. but first, let’s see what’s in the globetoday. oh, it’s all of my past romantic relationships. an open letter to failure.dear failure, you’re so often in the eyes of the beholder, like what looks like failureat one point in your life can later look like a wonderful success. i meancharles v had a lot of successes but ultimately he viewed his reign as a terrible failure.that’s why he eventually abdicated and retired

to a life of full time beer-drinking.and then he split up his empire with his brother getting the holy roman empire and his songetting spain. and that was probably marginally at leasta good thing for both the holy roman empire and spain.in short, failure almost no person is merely a failure or even merely a success.so enough with all these falsely constructed dichotomies failure, they are complete failure.best wishes, john green. so, the story of charles v reminds us of somethingwe learn again and again when studying world history: that there are multiple sides toevery piece of history. yes, the holy roman empire under charles vceased to be holy in the sense that it was

no longer 100% catholic, it was never romansince latin wasn’t among the many languages spoken there…and it wasn’t much of an empire because it was too diverse and spread out for charlesreally to have the power of an emperor. but as with most history, and many facebookrelationship statuses, and one meryl streep movie - it’s complicated.but perhaps the one concrete lesson we can take away from the history of charles v isthe benefits of acknowledging the limits of one’s power. charles never did.his imperial motto was plus ultra. and that means “further beyond,” but it could alsomean limitless. charles sought to fuse atlantic and central europe into seamless whole ona scale the size of today’s european union.

he tried to stamp out the protestant reformationand make his response, the catholic counter-reformation global.he tried to create new policies in the new world, while still defending old policiesin the old world. and by trying to be the most powerful emperorin the most powerful empire in the history of the world he failed spectacularly.there’s a lesson in that for all empires, and all nation-states, and even all people.thanks for watching. i’ll see you next week. crash course is filmed here in the chad andstacey emigholz studio in indianapolis and it’s made with the help of all of thesenice people and with your help. largely thanks to the support of our subbablesubscribers. subbable is a voluntary subscription

service that allows you to contribute directlyto crash course so we can keep it free for everyone forever. thank you for contributing,thank you for watching, and as we say in my hometown, “don’t forget to be awesome.”